Pair a dimes

Paradigm
shift in
thinking
required

>there is no reason that a western person can’t see things the same way and intuitively he does (‘what goes around comes around’

This conclusion is false. A western person can know but not understand. Mr Ted understands and knows. His approach appears to be to differentiate lesser minds who are speculating only rather than integrating HIS own concepts into HIS framework in terms HE can understand so as to be able to communicate. This appears to me to be like trying to explain calculus to an uneducated person by using pebbles. A considerable task indeed when you consider that most physicists don’t understand calculus. I feel that there is much to be gained in helping him in his quest.
>”I’m trying to imagine a science fiction movie in which large numbers of humans shifted their thinking to bring it more into alignment with what you’re suggesting. Perhaps it’s inaccurate to suggest humans would be responsible for this shift. However it happens, what would it look like I wonder?”

AE van Vogt, the world of Null A (non-aristotelian)

But yes, a new way of thinking is required, but I don’t see how this can be accomplished in the numbers necessary to enable the momentum required to shift mankind’s course. we need to get past how we think, and look instead at how we think about thinking. I’ve been trying to figure this out for 65 years without success. Somebody once commented, Eddington I think, “once we figure out that one and one is two, we think we understand. We forget we need to analyze “and”. No matter how eloquent the words, no matter how irrefutable the facts, no matter how impecable the logic, no matter how noble the cause, You know that they can’t hear you. Not in any way. There are no neurons there.

2 Responses to “Pair a dimes”

  1. walter james Says:

    walt, thanks, … ok, mancuso is working his way backwards as to the origin/source of direction of behaviour. first it was centralized and seated in the brain of the human, and next it is decentralized in the tentacles of plant roots and all we need is to take the next step and say that in crystals, the behaviours of the molecules is organized by the (community) dynamics of the molecular collective (e/m and gravitational conjugate habitat-inhabitant relational resonances therein, as with the wildgeese) and we end up with the conjugate habitat-inhabitant relation as being the common foundational shaping influence for form, behaviour and organization. the community of molecules and their manner of development in the ‘crystal’ being clear influenced by gravity, electromagnetism, thermal fields and all of the ‘fields’ we have defined which of course are all part of the dynamic one-ness of nature, that we have found it convenient to understand by breaking it apart into notionally separate pieces.

    mancuso talks about plantoid robots, but the plants have already captured humans and turned them into farmers, having them till and fertilize their soil and otherwise give them tender loving care so that they can enjoy a happy and healthy life-cycle.

    ted

  2. ellocogringo Says:

    mancuso talks about plantoid robots, but the plants have already captured humans and turned them into farmers, having them till and fertilize their soil and otherwise give them tender loving care so that they can enjoy a happy and healthy life-cycle.
    I love it. good summation by the way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: